You'll recall that I usually try to hit the famous and expensive restaurants during the semi-annual Restaurant Weeks, and even then, I prefer to do the lunches rather than the dinners (the food is usually exactly the same, so why pay $30 instead of $20?). I try to take advantage of daily specials and prix fixe menus to maximize my dining dollar. I also note that some things are actually cheaper to order out than to fix at home, especially since our nasty little Safeway grocery store in the Watergate complex has such expensive, poor quality produce and meats. And, then, I know not to run up a big tab at places where the food is less than exquisite—sometimes I have to eat to live, not live to eat.
If I'm short of cash, I might actually go to a fast food restaurant. McDonald's has double cheeseburgers for $1 each, and for $2.20 (10% sales tax in D.C.), one can get full (we won't talk about calories or fat grams). But, fast food is not always a good choice for budget dining. Not long ago, we were at Arby's in Springfield Mall. A combo meal of a roast beef sandwich, curly fries (did you know they don't have potato cakes at Arby's any more? I was so sad!), and a soft drink was $7.69. Going back for dessert items ($2-something) put the meal's cost at over $10 per person. And that was at a fast food place with no waiters or table service. I would rather go to a sit down restaurant and order sensibly and economically than pay that kind of money for fast food.
Such was also the case the other night when Ian and I went for happy hour and dinner at McFadden's. McFadden's, just across the street from the GWU campus, is a big bar with food. Mediocre food. In fact, our friend Laurent, a GWU alumnus, went drinking there for four years and didn't know they even had food. So, I don't like to spend much money there.
It was half price burger night, so I had a basic Angus burger with onion rings. No added cheese or other things on the burger. I drank water. It was $4, plus 40¢ tax plus 60¢ tip, totaling $5. I asked for the burger to be cooked medium, and it arrived with char on the outside, but still dripped blood from the inside (that averages out to medium, doesn't it?). The onion rings were limp and barely warm. But, hey, it was a $5 dinner.
Ian, on the other hand, didn't like the happy hour $2 beers, so he got a Guinness ($7). He didn't want a hamburger, so he got the vodka marinara pasta ($8) and had them add some grilled chicken (and what a pittance of chicken it was!) for an additional $3.
And, he wanted a salad, so he got a Caesar salad with no dressing ($6). Then, instead of another beer, he had a Coke ($2). He spent $26 plus $2.60 tax plus $3.90 tip, or $32.50 for a very mediocre dinner.
A lot of times, restaurants don't have exactly what I want. If I'm in the mood for a manhattan and the bar doesn't stock rye, then I don't drink a manhattan. If I want blueberry syrup for my pancakes and they only have "regular" or strawberry, I either do without or I use the regular (and I certainly don't pay a $2 upcharge for "real" Maple syrup!). It's just not a big deal. But, some people insist on certain foods or condiments. The other day, Ian was over and feeling thrifty and hungry at the same time, so I made us cheese omelettes, baked French fries, and whole grain toast for a quick and inexpensive meal with what was on hand. I'm out of catsup, though. No catsup is not really a big deal for me, since I usually eat fries plain or with the Belgian/French tradition of mayonnaise, and I have mayonnaise, plus a lot of the Ranch dressing that Ryan liked to use on his food, in the refrigerator. It was a crisis for Ian, however. He wouldn't eat the fries without catsup. It was so important to him that he left and walked to the Seven-Eleven to get catsup. By the time he got back, his food was cold, but at least he had catsup for his cold fries. He got what he wanted, but there was a cost to fulfilling his want.
I always think that people should eat what they like. They need to remember, though, that a lot of the extras and special requests and eccentricities add up, and that refusing to eat certain "sale" foods bumps them up to higher and higher price ranges. I get what I want. But I adjust my "want" to be reasonable for the establishment and the circumstances. For the $27.50 cost difference in our McFadden's dinners, I can easily afford to eat out another time, and at a really nice place, too (think about those $20 Restaurant Week lunches at the top restaurants in town).
And thus is the art of dining out in Washington.